Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] shallow: offer to prune only non-existing entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Thanks for confirming.
> 
> So even better would be to use `is_promisor_object(oid) ||
> has_object_file(oid)`, right?
> 
> This is something that is probably not even needed: as I mentioned, the
> shallow commits are *expected* to be local. It should not ever happen that
> they are fetched.

That would help, but I don't think it would help in the "fast-forward
from A to B where A is B's parent" case I describe in [1].

My suggestion was:

> It sounds safer to me to use the fast approach in this patch when the
> repository is not partial, and stick to the slow approach when it is.

which can be done by replacing "prune_shallow(0, 1)" in patch 3 with
"prune_shallow(0, !repository_format_partial_clone)", possibly with a comment
that the fast method checks object existence for each shallow line directly,
which is undesirable when the repository is a partial clone.
(repository_format_partial_clone is non-NULL with the name of the promisor
remote if the repository is a partial clone, and NULL otherwise).

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20181025185459.206127-1-jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux