Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > No. It was meant as Alex said it. Windows (MinGW) doesn't understand > > "chmod a+x blub". > > Yes, I suspected that. But I don't see a need for it on Windows (MinGW) to > begin with. True for Windows-centered projects. But for cross-platform projects --chmod=+x is needed every now and then. AFAIAC, it's alright to fall back to update-index for those occasions, even though they are not that rare due to a deficiency of merge-recursive: When it merges an executable file, it loses the +x bit, even if core.filemode=false! -- Hannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
