Re: the opposite of .gitignore, whitelist

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: the opposite of .gitignore, whitelist
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:37:58 +0900
Cc: git <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <201810251039388653199@163.com> (lhf's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:39:39 +0800")
References: <201810251039388653199@163.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

"lhf635@xxxxxxx" <lhf635@xxxxxxx> writes:

> I have a good idea, add a file to git that is the opposite of .gitignore...,

Do negative patterns in .gitignore file help without inventing
anything new?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: the opposite of .gitignore, whitelist
  - From: Jason Cooper

References:
- the opposite of .gitignore, whitelist
  - From: lhf635@xxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: cleanup for gcc 8.2.1 warning
Next by Date: Re: New semantic patches vs. in-flight topics [was: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Bring more repository handles into our code base]
Previous by thread: the opposite of .gitignore, whitelist
Next by thread: Re: the opposite of .gitignore, whitelist
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux