Re: [RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects
From: Matthew DeVore <matvore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 18:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gitster@xxxxxxxxx, pclouds@xxxxxxxxx, peff@xxxxxxxx, jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx, jeffhost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <cover.1540256910.git.matvore@google.com>
References: <cover.1540256910.git.matvore@google.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)



On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, Matthew DeVore wrote:

This patch set fixes incorrect parsing of the --exclude-promisor-objects
option that I found while working on:


Somehow I sent two copies of every message in the patchset. I'm sorry
for the mess.

References:
- [RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects
  - From: Matthew DeVore

Prev by Date: [RFC 2/2] exclude-promisor-objects: declare when option is allowed
Next by Date: [PATCH] Documentation/config.txt: fix typo in core.alternateRefsCommand
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] revisions.c: put promisor option in specialized struct
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux