Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] protocol: advertise multiple supported versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > similar to argv_array_pushl  or would that be overengineered?

> Am I missing some other way to do this cleanly? I'll admit I'm not very
> familiar with va_lists.

Ah, you're right. By not passing pointers (and I am unfamiliar
with va_lists, too), this was a moot suggestion.
>
> Yeah, my understanding is that we don't want to assume that version
> identifiers will always be simple integers. We could get away with
> sprintf() for now, but I figured I didn't want to cause future pain
> if/when the version identifiers become complex.

Makes sense.

Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux