On 20 Oct 2018, at 01:03, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >foo**bar would match foobar as well as foo/bar, foo/x/bar and >foo/x/y/bar... Its behavior is error prone in my opinion. There's also >some concerns in early iterations of this "**" support that we would >need to revisit if we want 'rsync' behavior. I'm not very excited >about doing that. That's fair. I guess another point in favour of your second option is that it's essentially the same behaviour used by bash (with the `globstar` option) and zsh (with the default options); they also give `**` special recursion powers only when used in a path component by itself, otherwise it acts like `*`. So there's precedent there. dana
