Re: [PATCH] diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:49:58 -0700
Cc: andreenkosa@xxxxxxxxx, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, git <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <ae6fc699-6e09-2979-40dc-9cc49f4f8365@kdbg.org>
References: <CAD1gVxMg0ZiKqFABrnwt0v_=wr2X_3ErkR92RmCAtFQnuM+L5w@mail.gmail.com> <xmqqr2gu8dsx.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> <ae6fc699-6e09-2979-40dc-9cc49f4f8365@kdbg.org>

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:38 AM Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There is one peculiarity, though: [...]

The explanation makes sense, and the code looks good.
Do we want to have a test for this niche case?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
  - From: Johannes Sixt

References:
- issue: strange `git diff --numstat` behavior.
  - From: Sergey Andreenko
- Re: issue: strange `git diff --numstat` behavior.
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- [PATCH] diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
  - From: Johannes Sixt

Prev by Date: [PATCH] unpack-trees: avoid dead store for struct progress
Next by Date: [PATCH] multi-pack-index: avoid dead store for struct progress
Previous by thread: [PATCH] diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux