Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] reset: don't compute unstaged changes after reset when --quiet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:18 PM Ben Peart <peartben@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I actually started my effort to speed up reset by attempting to
> multi-thread refresh_index().  You can see a work in progress at:
>
> https://github.com/benpeart/git/pull/new/refresh-index-multithread-gvfs
>
> The patch doesn't always work as it is still not thread safe.  When it
> works, it's great but I ran into to many difficulties trying to debug
> the remaining threading issues (even adding print statements would
> change the timing and the repro would disappear).  It will take a lot of
> code review to discover and fix the remaining non-thread safe code paths.
>
> In addition, the optimized code path that takes advantage of fsmonitor,
> uses multiple threads, fscache, etc _already exists_ in preload_index().
>   Trying to recreate all those optimizations in refresh_index() is (as I
> discovered) a daunting task.

Why not make refresh_index() run preload_index() first (or the
parallel lstat part to be precise), and only do the heavy
content-based refresh in single thread mode?
-- 
Duy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux