On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:30 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > This is based on ao/submodule-wo-gitmodules-checked-out. > > > > This resends origin/sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip, resolving > > the issues pointed out via origin/xxx/sb-submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip-in-pu > > by basing this series on origin/ao/submodule-wo-gitmodules-checked-out > > Applying this round to the result of merging ao/submodule-* to > 'master' requires this to work, it seems, as you've introduced a > call to repo-init thing in the meantime with another topic. Unfortunately, yes, sb/submodule-update-in-c had one such call. > > This is based on ao/submodule-wo-gitmodules-checked-out. > Thanks. I had an impression that we were not entirely happy with > the topic and are expecting a reroll, but let's hope that the part > we expect to be updated won't have much overlaps. I slowly came to the realization that this topic might be ripped up into 2 or more topics, as some of the cleanups seem to be orthogonal.
