Lily Ballard <lily@xxxxxx> writes: > I haven’t checked any other commands that the glossary lists as > taking pathspecs (except `git add`, which does properly list it as > taking pathspecs), so I don’t know if any of the other commands > incorrectly list themselves as taking files when they take > pathspecs. I do not offhand think of a command that only takes pathname, including "ls-files". New users would think "git cmd README" is taking a single filename "README", and "ls-files" doc uses "file" in a misguided attempt to be "newbie friendly", but it always has used that "README" string as a pattern to match paths against.
