Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Bring more repository handles into our code base

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:50 AM Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> It appears that some patches use a the_index-style
> NO_THE_REPOSITORY_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS backward compatibility synonym
> and others don't.  Can you say a little more about this aspect of the
> approach?  Would the compatibility macros go away eventually?

I use the macro only when not doing the whole conversion in the patch
(i.e. there is a coccinelle patch IFF there is the macro and vice versa).

It's quite frankly a judgement call what I would convert as a whole
and what not, it depends on the usage of the functions and if I know
series that are in flight using it. The full conversion is easy to write if
there are less than a hand full of callers, so for the "small case", I just
did it, hoping it won't break other topics in flight.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux