Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2018, #02; Sat, 13)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> * sb/strbuf-h-update (2018-09-29) 1 commit
>  - strbuf.h: format according to coding guidelines
>
>  Code clean-up to serve as a BCP example.
>
>  What's the status of this one after the discussion thread stopped here?
>  cf. <CAGZ79kbV6QjsFKcD2uG_P9j1AvzSNQSi-_jXGQ9w0YU9fjhEGg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I started rewriting the documentation according to your proposal of having
parameters with name, then referred to as NAME in the docs.

After a few examples, I must admit I do not like that style,
so I would just want to do the minimal part that would get this patch landed,
i.e.
(a) convince you that the patch is good as-is or
(b) resend with fewer parameters made explicit if
    we desire to be concise instead.

> * nd/the-index (2018-09-21) 23 commits
>   (merged to 'next' on 2018-10-10 at 16e2e2e947)
[...]
>  (this branch is used by sb/more-repo-in-api.)
>
>  Various codepaths in the core-ish part learn to work on an
>  arbitrary in-core index structure, not necessarily the default
>  instance "the_index".
>
>  Will merge to 'master'.

Cool!

sb/more-repo-in-api is not part of this message,
but it requires at least one resend, so I'll do that.


> * sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip (2018-10-11) 9 commits
>  . builtin/fetch: check for submodule updates for non branch fetches
>  . fetch: retry fetching submodules if needed objects were not fetched
>  . submodule: fetch in submodules git directory instead of in worktree
>  . repository: repo_submodule_init to take a submodule struct
>  . submodule.c: do not copy around submodule list
>  . submodule.c: move global changed_submodule_names into fetch submodule struct
>  . submodule.c: sort changed_submodule_names before searching it
>  . submodule.c: fix indentation
>  . sha1-array: provide oid_array_filter
>
>  "git fetch --recurse-submodules" may not fetch the necessary commit
>  that is bound to the superproject, which is getting corrected.
>
>  Ejected for now, as it has fallouts in places like t/helper/.

This is the first time I hear about that, I'll look into that.
The tipmost commit there is also shoddy, I'll redo that.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux