Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Teach the builtin rebase about the builtin interactive rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
> writes:
> 
> > Note: while this patch targets pk/rebase-in-c-6-final, it will not work
> > correctly without ag/rebase-i-in-c. So my suggestion is to rewrite the 
> > pk/rebas-in-c-6-final branch by first merging ag/rebase-i-in-c, then
> > applying this here patch, and only then cherry-pick "rebase: default to
> > using the builtin rebase".
> 
> Is this a stale comment in the context of v3, where we pretty much
> know how the resulting topic should intertwine with other topics?  I
> am trying to see if I have do to anything differently this time, or
> just replacing the single commit while keeping the structure around
> that commit the same is fine.

Just replacing the single commit. For technical reasons, I still have to
target pk/rebase-in-c-6-final in my branch.

> Also, I see there is a new iteration v8 of ag/rebase-i-in-c on the
> list, sent on Sep 27th (you were CC'ed but I suspect it was before
> you came back).  Are you happy with that update?

To be quite honest, I did not yet have time to look over it, but I
verified that it has my suggested fix for the -S option.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux