Re: [PATCH] doc: move git-rev-parse from porcelain to plumbing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniels Umanovskis <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 10/11/18 12:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Among the remaining ones in the list, cherry and get-tar-commit-id
>> are probably better classified as plumbing.  I do not know why
>> cherry is marked for completion; perhaps some crazy people use that
>> on the command line?
>
> I think cherry could go either way, get-tar-commit-id is definitely
> plumbing. Would you like me to fix those two on the same patch then?

No, what you sent for rev-parse is already good.  A separate patch
that addresses other ones can be discussed as an orthogonal matter.
It even may deserve to make them two separate patches, as I
anticipate that some people would resist marking "cherry" as
plumbing, so that only one can be applied while dropping the other
as/if needed.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux