On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:26:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Of course, I could be completely wrong about people using this. Maybe > > svn-fe builds are just completely broken on my system, and maybe people > > really do use testsvn::. But if so, they certainly aren't talking about > > it on the mailing list. :) > > My take: > > - svn-fe works fine and has been useful to me, though its Makefile > could likely be simplified and made more user-friendly > > - I've benefited from the test coverage of having this in-tree > > - testsvn:: is a demo and at a minimum we ought not to install it > with "make install" > > - keeping this in-tree for the benefit of just one user is excessive, > so removing it is probably the right thing > > - it would be nice if the commit removing this code from Git includes > a note to help people find its new home > > Would you mind holding off until I'm able to arrange that last bit? Any further thoughts / movement on this? Not urgent, but I saw you mention it in another thread, and it's on my "to be decided" pile. -Peff
