Re: git fetch <remote> <branch> behaves weirdely when run in a worktree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Sorry for the delay. Got a little busy over the weekend. I seem to have
found the reason behind the issue in the mean time :-)


On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 10:05 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 05:24:14PM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:46 AM Kaartic Sivaraam
> > > <kaartic.sivaraam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > This is the most interesting part of the issue. I **did not** run
> > > > 'git fetch ...' in between those cat commands. I was surprised by
> > > > how the contents of FETCH_HEAD are changing without me spawning any
> > > > git processes that might change it. Am I missing something here? As
> > > > far as i could remember, there wasn't any IDE running that might
> > > > automatically spawn git commands especially in that work
> > > > tree. Weird.
> > 
> > Maybe something like this could help track down that rogue "git fetch"
> > process (it's definitely _some_ process writing to the wrong file; or
> > some file synchronization thingy is going on). You can log more of
> > course, but this is where FETCH_HEAD is updated.
> 

Thanks for the patch! It really helped me identify the issue.

The actual culprit here doesn't seem to be Git itself. It was the "git-
prompt" bash plug-in[1] I was using. It seems to be spawning "git
fetch" for every command I type on shell. That answers why the
FETCH_HEAD was being updated even though I wasn't explicitly running
it. The git bash plug-in seems to be fetching changes for *all* the
upstream branches. That answers why there FETCH_HEAD was populated with
info about all the branches when I explicitly requested for the next
branch. I've also verified that `git fetch origin next` works as
intended (FETCH_HEAD has info only about orgin/next) when I turn-off
the plug-in which confirms that it's the culprit. A cursory search
found me a related issue[2] but I'm not sure if it's the exact same
one.

I could identify the culprit only with the help of Duy's patch. Thanks
Duy! Sorry for not realising this earlier. I almost forgot I'm using it
as I've been accustomed to it a lot.


> Well, a background-ish thing could be some vendor-provided copy of
> Git that has nothing to do with what Kaartic would be compiling with
> this patch X-<.

Fortunately, it wasn't the case here as the plug-in was using my
manually-built version of Git :-)

Thanks for the help!

Tag-line: Sometimes tools become part of our workflow so much that we
really don't realise their presence. It's an indication of a good tool
but we should be aware of suspecting them when an issue arises!
Something which I should have done to realise the issue ealier x-<


References:
[1]: https://github.com/magicmonty/bash-git-prompt
[2]: https://github.com/magicmonty/bash-git-prompt/issues/125

Thanks,
Sivaraam




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux