On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 02:17:08PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Do we want to limit this to git-branch, though? Ideally any output you
> get from git-branch could be replicated with for-each-ref (or with
> a custom "branch --format").
>
> I.e., could we have a format in ref-filter that matches HEAD, but
> returns a distinct symbol for a worktree HEAD? That would allow a few
> things:
I was going to suggest using dim green and green for elsewhere and here
respectively, in a similar way how range-diff uses it to show different
versions of the same diff.
But if we're open to change how branches are displayed maybe a config
option like branch.format (probably not the best name choice) that can
be set to the 'for-each-ref --format' syntax would be way more flexible.
e.g.
branch.format='%(if:equals=+)...'
I think the different symbol and dimmed color would be a nice addition,
but I am leaning towards giving the user the ultimate choice on how they
want to format their output. (Maybe with dimmed plus symbol as default).
--
Cheers,
Rafael Ascensão
