On Thu, Sep 27 2018, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:53:24PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 27 2018, SZEDER Gábor wrote: >> >> > This is the second attempt to fix the racy split index problem, which >> > causes occasional failures in several random test scripts when run >> > with 'GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes'. The important details are in patches >> > 1 and 5 (corresponding to v1's 3 and 5). >> >> Thanks. I'm running the same sorts of tests I noted in >> https://public-inbox.org/git/87va7ireuu.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ on >> this. The fix Jeff had that you noted in >> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180906151439.GA8016@localhost/ is now in >> "master". >> >> I take it your >> https://github.com/szeder/git/commits/racy-split-index-fix is the same >> as this submission? > > Yes. > >> Anyway, I'm testing that cherry-picked on top of the >> latest master. >> >> Unfortunate that we couldn't get the isolated test you made in >> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180907034942.GA10370@localhost/ > > Nah, that's not an isolated test case, that's only a somewhat > narrowed-down, but rather reliable reproduction recipe while I still > had no idea what was going on :) > > The _real_ isolated test is the last test in t1701, that's what it > eventually boiled down to. Thanks. I had ~400 runs of the tests I ran before and they were all OK. Now trying also with t1701 (which I hadn't noticed was a new test...). >> but I >> don't see how it could be added without some very liberal >> getenv("GIT_TEST_blahblah"), so it's probably best to not add it, >> particularly with the C rewrite of git-stash in-flight. >> >> I'll report back when I have enough test data to say how these patches >> affect the intermittent test failures under GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes.