Re: [PATCH] diff: round down similarity index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Ren� Scharfe wrote:
>>
>>> Rounding down the printed (dis)similarity index allows us to use
>>> "100%" as a special value that indicates complete rewrites and
>>> fully equal file contents, respectively.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> +static int similarity_index(struct diff_filepair *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	int result = p->score * 100.0 / MAX_SCORE;
>>> +
>>> +	/* Paranoia: guard against floating point rounding errors. */
>>> +	if (p->score == MAX_SCORE)
>>> +		result = 100;
>>> +	else if (result == 100)
>>> +		result = 99;
>>> +
>>> +	return result;
>>> +}

>> Besides, AFAIR p->score is not even calculated if the files are identical, 
>> because that hits a different code path.

True, ->score is set to MAX_SCORE for identical files by a different
code path than the one that actually compares the contents and
calculates a score.  That doesn't matter for printing the "similarity
index nn%" line etc., though.  Or is there a way for identical files to
end up with a ->score of 0 (or some other value != MAX_SCORE) that I missed?

In any case, the patch doesn't change the way the score is calculated,
i.e. its value is the same as before.  It only changes how it is displayed.

René
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux