Re: Git Test Coverage Report (Tuesday, Sept 25)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In an effort to ensure new code is reasonably covered by the test
> suite, we now have contrib/coverage-diff.sh to combine the gcov output
> from 'make coverage-test ; make coverage-report' with the output from
> 'git diff A B' to discover _new_ lines of code that are not covered.
>
> This report takes the output of these results after running on four
> branches:
>
>         pu: 80e728fa913dc3a1165b6dec9a7afa6052a86325
>
>        jch: 0c10634844314ab89666ed0a1c7d36dde7ac9689
>
>       next: 76f2f5c1e34c4dbef1029e2984c2892894c444ce
>
>     master: fe8321ec057f9231c26c29b364721568e58040f7
>
> master@{1}: 2d3b1c576c85b7f5db1f418907af00ab88e0c303
>
> I ran the test suite on each of these branches on an Ubuntu Linux VM,
> and I'm missing some dependencies (like apache, svn, and perforce) so
> not all tests are run.

Thanks.

> master@{1}..master:
>
> builtin/remote.c
> 5025425dfff     (   Shulhan     2018-09-13 20:18:33 +0700
> 864)            return error(_("No such remote: '%s'"), name);
> commit-reach.c
> b67f6b26e35     (Derrick Stolee 2018-09-21 08:05:26 -0700
> 559)                    continue;
> b67f6b26e35     (Derrick Stolee 2018-09-21 08:05:26 -0700
> 569)                    from->objects[i].item->flags |= assign_flag;
> b67f6b26e35     (Derrick Stolee 2018-09-21 08:05:26 -0700
> 570)                    continue;
> b67f6b26e35     (Derrick Stolee 2018-09-21 08:05:26 -0700
> 576)                    result = 0;
> b67f6b26e35     (Derrick Stolee 2018-09-21 08:05:26 -0700
> 577)                    goto cleanup;
> cat: compat#mingw.c.gcov: No such file or directory
> ll-merge.c
> d64324cb60e     (Torsten Bögershausen   2018-09-12 21:32:02
> +0200       379)                    marker_size =
> DEFAULT_CONFLICT_MARKER_SIZE;
> remote-curl.c
> c3b9bc94b9b     (Elijah Newren  2018-09-05 10:03:07 -0700
> 181)            options.filter = xstrdup(value);

As I think the data presented here is very valuable, let me ignore
the findings of this specific run (which will be fixed by individual
authors as/if necessary), and focus on the way the data is presented
(which will affect the ease of consumption by authors of future
commits).

These wrapped blame output lines are harder to view.  Can we have
this in plain/text without format=flowed at least?  

I personally do not mind a monospaced and non-wrapping website, just
I do not mind visiting travis-ci.org for recent results from time to
time.  Others may differ.

There is an error message from "cat" in it, by the way.

> preload-index.c
> ae9af12287b     (Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy   2018-09-15 19:56:04
> +0200       73)                     struct progress_data *pd =
> p->progress;
> ae9af12287b     (Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy   2018-09-15 19:56:04
> +0200       75) pthread_mutex_lock(&pd->mutex);
> ae9af12287b     (Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy   2018-09-15 19:56:04
> +0200       76)                     pd->n += last_nr - nr;
> ae9af12287b     (Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy   2018-09-15 19:56:04
> +0200       77) display_progress(pd->progress, pd->n);
> ae9af12287b     (Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy   2018-09-15 19:56:04
> +0200       78) pthread_mutex_unlock(&pd->mutex);
> ae9af12287b     (Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy   2018-09-15 19:56:04
> +0200       79)                     last_nr = nr;

I wonder how much we can save the effort that is needed to scan the
output if we somehow coalesce these consecutive lines that are
attributed to the same commit.

In any case, thanks for doing this.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux