Re: [PATCH 3/8] refs: new ref types to make per-worktree refs visible to all worktrees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:48 AM Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch also makes it possible to specify refs from one worktree in
> > another one, e.g.
> >
> >     git log worktrees/foo/HEAD
>
> This has strong similarities to remote refs:
> Locally I may have a branch master, whose (stale local copy of its
> distributed) counterpart is named origin/master.

If you think of each worktree as independent clones (which is more or
less true, the fact that they share ODB is more like an implementation
detail) then yes it's almost like remotes.

> It is also possible to have a working tree named origin
> (just I like to name my worktree "git", when working on git.git),
> how do we differentiate between the neighbor-worktree
> "origin/master" and the remote-tracking branch "origin/master" ?

Hmm.. I think you're thinking that origin/master could either mean
refs/worktrees/origin/master or refs/remotes/origin/master. I do not
think we're going to support expanding origin/master to
refs/worktrees/origin/master. This part about ref resolution did cross
my mind but I didn't see a good reason to support it.

Even if we do support it, this is not even a new problem. If you have
refs/heads/origin/master and refs/remotes/origin/master now, we have
ref ambiguity anyway and a solution for this should handle
refs/worktrees/origin/master well if it comes into the picture.

> As the remote tracking branches are shared between all
> worktree there is no need to differentiate between a
> local-worktree remote tracking branch and a
> neighbor-worktree remote tracking branch.
>
> Now that you introduce the magic main working tree,
> we also need to disallow working trees to be named "main",
> i.e.
>     $ git worktree add main HEAD
>
> produces
>
>   $ ls .git/worktrees/
>   main
>
> How do we deal with that?

main is accessed via worktrees/main/HEAD while the main worktree's
HEAD is accessed via main/HEAD (which is _not_ automatically expanded
to refs/worktrees/main/HEAD). But if it is, yes we need to detect
ambiguity and tell the user to specify full ref name, either
refs/main/HEAD or refs/worktrees/main/HEAD.
-- 
Duy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux