On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:19:28PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 07:47:07PM +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > > > When you type "git help" (or just "git") you are greeted with a list > > with commonly used commands and their short description and are > > suggested to use "git help -a" or "git help -g" for more details. > > > > "git help -av" would be more friendly and inline with what is shown > > with "git help" since it shows list of commands with description as > > well, and commands are properly grouped. > > I agree that "help -av" is likely to be more friendly. I kind of wonder > if it should just be the default for "-a". Do we have any obligation not > to change the format of that output? I agree, though I'd like to clarify what you said before doing so wholeheartedly. Did you mean that all existing uses of 'git help -a' should instead mean 'git help -av' (i.e., that '-a' after your proposed patch means the same as '-av' in revisions prior to this one?) If so, I agree. I can't imagine a case where I'd like to provide '-a' and _not_ '-v', so certainly the later should come as a two-for-one deal. Less, more well-intentioned knobs seems a positive trend to me, so I am for this idea. Thanks, Taylor
