On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:15 AM Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Summary: > merge_file_1() -> merge_mode_and_contents() > merge_content() -> handle_content_merge() > > merge_file_1() is a very unhelpful name. Rename it to > merge_mode_and_contents() to reflect what it does. > > merge_content() calls merge_mode_and_contents() to do the main part of > its work, but most of this function was about higher level stuff, e.g. > printing out conflict messages, updating skip_worktree bits, checking > for ability to avoid updating the working tree or for D/F conflicts > being in the way, etc. Since there are several handle_*() functions for > similar levels of checking and handling in merge-recursive.c (e.g. > handle_change_delete(), handle_rename_rename_2to1()), let's rename this > function to handle_content_merge(). > > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> I looked through the whole series and 1,2,4 are obvious improvements IMHO, and 3 in itself is not worth it if it weren't for 4 (as now we don't have neither _1 and _one functions in this file). The whole series looks good to me. Thanks, Stefan
