Re: [PATCH] gc: fix regression in 7b0f229222 impacting --quiet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:04, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fix a regression in my recent 7b0f229222 ("commit-graph write: add
> progress output", 2018-09-17), the newly added progress output for
> "commit-graph write" didn't check the --quiet option.

s/, t/. T/, perhaps. Maybe also s/did/does/.

> Do so, and add a test asserting that this works as expected. Since the
> TTY perquisite isn't available everywhere let's add a version of this

s/perq/prereq/

> that both requires and doesn't require that. This test might be overly
> specific and will break if new progress output is added, but I think
> it'll serve as a good reminder to test the undertested progress
> mode(s).

> +test_expect_success 'gc --no-quiet' '
> +       git -c gc.writeCommitGraph=true gc --no-quiet >stdout 2>stderr &&
> +       ! test -s stdout &&

`test_must_be_empty` for easier debugging?

> +       test_line_count = 1 stderr &&
> +       test_i18ngrep "Computing commit graph generation numbers" stderr
> +'




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux