Re: [PATCH] t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh: sort cookies before comparing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:45:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Yes, I think sorting the expect file would work fine. I'm OK with that,
> > or just leaving a comment. The comment has the bonus that it does not
> > cost an extra process at runtime. I'd probably use a sort if we expected
> > the list to be long and complicated, since it makes life easier on a
> > future developer. But since there are only 2 lines, I don't think it's a
> > big deal either way (or even just leaving it as-is without a comment is
> > probably OK).
> 
> Let's have "| sort" if only for its documentation value.  That way
> we do not have to remember the list must be sorted.

OK, though...

> diff --git a/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh b/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh
> index 771f36f9ff..d13b993201 100755
> --- a/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh
> +++ b/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ test_expect_success 'dumb clone via http-backend respects namespace' '
>  cat >cookies.txt <<EOF
>  127.0.0.1	FALSE	/smart_cookies/	FALSE	0	othername	othervalue
>  EOF
> -cat >expect_cookies.txt <<EOF
> +cat <<EOF | sort >expect_cookies.txt

This can be spelled:

  sort >expect_cookies.txt <<EOF

can't it? Then we do not even incur the extra process. :)

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux