Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> > What's the donness of this one? >> > cf. <20180717201348.GD26218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This topic has stayed in 'pu' for a long time. I thought it was >> concluded that this was a good change? Jeff, Jonathan? > > I read over the thread again. I don't think I actually have any > complaints about the patches as-is. There was some discussion from Junio > and Ævar about the third one. I don't have a strong opinion. My > experience has been that "gc --auto" is garbage anyway on the server > side, but I think Ævar's experience is that it's reasonable for small to > medium sites (which seems plausible to me). > > The message-id quoted there is my "this looks good". I mentioned a few > possible nits, but I think it would be OK with or without them > addressed. That matches my reading of your position. I tend to agree with Ævar's recommendation to postpone 3/3 and use 1 & 2 for now. By the way, people shouldn't read too much into the messages referred to in "What's cooking"; they are not "these messages point out all the issues that block the topic". It's just "I am aware of this thread, which readers would hopefully find a good starting point to form their opinions". Thanks.
