Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] eoie: add End of Index Entry (EOIE) extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> But it _is_ available now. If you need it, you write the extension
> out.

Are you arguing for making it omitted when it is not needed (e.g.
small enough index file)?  IOW, did you mean "If you do not need it,
you do not write it out" by the above?

I do not think overhead of writing (or preparing to write) the
extension for a small index file is by definition small enough ;-).

I do not think the configuration that decides if the reader side
uses parallel reading should have any say in the decision to write
(or omit) the extension, by the way.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux