Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 12:22 PM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Wait there's no way to disable this parallel reading? Does not sound >> right. And if ordinary numbers mean the number of threads then 0 >> should mean no threading. Auto detection could have a new keyword, >> like 'auto'. > > My bad. Disabling threading means _1_ thread. What was I thinking... I did the same during my earlier review. It seems that it somehow is unintuitive to us that we do not specify how many _extra_ threads of control we dedicate to ;-).
