Re: Git trademark status and policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> (Also, to be clear, this is all _only_ about "Git Cola". The "git-cola"
> command is explicitly OK in the policy because that's how commands
> work).

These match my understanding.  Thanks for spelling them out.  That
project is an example of being a good ecosystem citizen whose name
we were happy to grand-father while discussing the trademark policy.

I can undertand the sentiment that we may not want to appear drawing
lines among friends, but ultimately the policy is about protecting
our friends from non-friends, so whether we like it or not, we may
have to be more explicit about who's grandfathered and who's not
than before.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux