Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] fsmonitor: update GIT_TEST_FSMONITOR support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Peart <peartben@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The difference here is that core.fsmonitor isn't a boolean value.  It
> is a string to a command that is executed so it can't be moved over to
> get_env_bool().

Ah, of course ;-)

Then please take the following as a review comment for 4/4; checking
if each getenv(VAR) should or should not become git_env_bool() and
updating them should be done as a separate change for variables
whether they are being renamed or not in this series.

>> I _think_ the renaming should be done without getting mixed with
>> other changes like the git_env_bool() done in 4/4.  The idea to use
>> git_env_bool() in stead of getenv() may be a good one, but then we
>> should consistently do so when appropriate, and that would make a
>> fine theme for another topic.
>>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux