Re: 100%

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> By the same reasoning, you could say "never round down to 0%, because I 
> want to know when there is no similarity".
>
> You cannot be exact when you have to cut off fractions, so why try for 
> _exactly_ one number?

R0 or C0 would not happen in real life, so 0% is a moot issue.

However, wasn't that you who did follow that "certain numbers
are special" logic in diffstat?

You advocated "diff --stat" should draw at least one +/- for a
patch that adds/removes lines.  And I (and others) agreed
because zero is special in the context of that application.

I think reserving R100 to mean "identical byte sequences" has
value, when people look at --name-status output, in the context
of "similarity index".


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux