On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:30 AM Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The mentioned --filter=tree:0 would basically do what I want it seems, > good to hear!. I wonder why not call it tree:none though to match > blob:none. There are some plans of making tree: accept positive integers in order to filter out files greater than that depth. e.g. tree:1 would fetch all blobs and tree objects directly contained by the tree. tree:2 would fetch every object tree:1 does plus anything referred to directly by those objects.
