I think we > should revert e98317508c0 in "master" (for 2.19) and keep making use > of that 'second try' in "next" (for 2.20). Actually I'd rather revert the whole topic leading up to 7e25437d35a (Merge branch 'sb/submodule-core-worktree', 2018-07-18) as the last patch in there doesn't work well without e98317508c0 IIRC. And having only the first patch would bring an inconsistent state as then different commands behave differently w.r.t. setting core.worktree. So for this release we'd git revert 984cd77ddbf0 e98317508c 4fa4f90ccd85 and then can git cherry-pick 4fa4f90ccd8 984cd77ddbf0 on top of sb/submodule-update-in-c, as that re-instates the behavior going forward. Thoughts? Thanks, Stefan
