Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] builtin rebase options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've rebuilt the collection of topics up to pk/rebase-in-c-6-final
> with these two updated series twice, once doing it manually, like I
> did the last time, and another using "rebase -i -r" on top of the
> updated pk/rebase-in-c-4-opts.  The resulting trees match, of
> course.

Just to clarify, "trees match" means "'rebase -i -r' gave us the
correct result" ;-).

> I guess that is the answer to a question you asked earlier, which I
> haven't answered so far because I didn't have a good grasp of where
> my preference was coming from when it was asked.  Now I know, so...

In case the question was unclear it was "is there a reason why you
do not want to use rebase -ir?"

If "cherry-pick" did not lose notes, I would have preferred to do
this kind of rebuilding dependent chains of topics without using
rebase at all, but that is a different story.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux