Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The submodule subsystem is really bad at staying within 80 characters.
> Fix it while we are here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> submodule.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
> index da2ed8696f5..8345d423fda 100644
> --- a/submodule.c
> +++ b/submodule.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,8 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
> if (!submodule) {
> const char *name = default_name_or_path(ce->name);
> if (name) {
> - default_submodule.path = default_submodule.name = name;
> + default_submodule.path = name;
> + default_submodule.name = name;
Besides indentation, it is good to avoid A = B = C assignment.
Written this way, it is more obvious that these two fields share the
same pointer.
Good.
> submodule = &default_submodule;
> }
> }
> @@ -1254,8 +1255,9 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
> default:
> case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_DEFAULT:
> case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON_DEMAND:
> - if (!submodule || !unsorted_string_list_lookup(&changed_submodule_names,
> - submodule->name))
> + if (!submodule || !unsorted_string_list_lookup(
> + &changed_submodule_names,
> + submodule->name))
if (!submodule ||
!unsorted_string_list_lookup(
&changed_submodule_names,
submodule->name))
would be easier to see what is going on.
