Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > That code isn't lib-ified enough to be run in process, but I think the > patch below should give similar behavior to what fsck currently does. > We'd need to tell index-pack to use our fsck.* config for its checks, I > imagine. The progress here is still per-pack, but I think we could pass > in sufficient information to have it do one continuous meter across all > of the packs (see the in-code comment). > > And it makes the result multi-threaded, and lets us drop a bunch of > duplicate code. > > --- > builtin/fsck.c | 53 +++++++------ > pack-check.c | 142 ----------------------------------- > pack.h | 1 - > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-) The numbers here are nice, even to readers who do not necessarily care about the progress meter output ;-)
