Re: [PATCH] i18n: fix dangling dot in die() messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:59 PM Jean-Noel Avila <jn.avila@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Your commit message says "dangling dot"...

> diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> index b56028ba9d..a011abfd7c 100644
> --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static void runcommand_in_submodule_cb(const struct cache_entry *list_item,
>                 printf(_("Entering '%s'\n"), displaypath);
>
>         if (info->argv[0] && run_command(&cp))
> -               die(_("run_command returned non-zero status for %s\n."),
> +               die(_("run_command returned non-zero status for %s"),

...but here and below you're also removing the newline. Is this
intended, and does it work as desired afterwards? I.e. were we just
ignoring the \n?

>                         displaypath);
>
>         if (info->recursive) {
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void runcommand_in_submodule_cb(const struct cache_entry *list_item,
>
>                 if (run_command(&cpr))
>                         die(_("run_command returned non-zero status while "
> -                               "recursing in the nested submodules of %s\n."),
> +                               "recursing in the nested submodules of %s"),
>                                 displaypath);
>         }
>
> --
> 2.18.0
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux