Hi Eric, On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:10 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget > <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This will come in handy when publishing the results of Git's test suite > > during an automated VSTS CI run. > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > --- > > diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh > > @@ -431,11 +434,24 @@ trap 'exit $?' INT > > test_failure_ () { > > + if test -n "$write_junit_xml" > > + then > > + junit_insert="<failure message=\"not ok $test_count -" > > + junit_insert="$junit_insert $(xml_attr_encode "$1")\">" > > + junit_insert="$junit_insert $(xml_attr_encode \ > > + "$(printf '%s\n' "$@" | sed 1d)")" > > + junit_insert="$junit_insert</failure>" > > This is a genuine failure, so you're creating a <failure> node. Okay. > > > + write_junit_xml_testcase "$1" " $junit_insert" > > + fi > > @@ -444,11 +460,19 @@ test_failure_ () { > > test_known_broken_ok_ () { > > + if test -n "$write_junit_xml" > > + then > > + write_junit_xml_testcase "$* (breakage fixed)" > > + fi > > test_fixed=$(($test_fixed+1)) > > say_color error "ok $test_count - $@ # TODO known breakage vanished" > > } > > This was expected to fail but didn't, which means it probably needs > some sort of attention. test_known_broken_ok_() prints this result in > the 'error' color, and test_done() re-inforces that by printing a > message, also in 'error' color: > > 42 known breakage(s) vanished; please update test(s) > > So, should this emit a <failure> node also, perhaps with 'type' > attribute set to "warning" or something? (<failure type="WARNING" > message="...">) My primary aim is to display the test results in the web interface, see e.g. https://git.visualstudio.com/git/_build/results?buildId=128&view=ms.vss-test-web.test-result-details The parser for JUnit XML (and in fact, the JUnit XML schema itself) do not allow for such a warning. If you add a `<failure>`, then the build fails. And we do not want the build to fail. Historically, I saw quite a couple of "vanished" breakages depending on the platform where I ran the tests. > > @@ -758,9 +793,58 @@ test_at_end_hook_ () { > > +xml_attr_encode () { > > + # We do not translate CR to 
 because BSD sed does not handle > > + # \r in the regex. In practice, the output should not even have any > > + # carriage returns. > > + printf '%s\n' "$@" | > > + sed -e 's/&/\&/g' -e "s/'/\'/g" -e 's/"/\"/g' \ > > + -e 's/</\</g' -e 's/>/\>/g' \ > > + -e 's/ /\	/g' -e 's/$/\
/' -e '$s/
$//' | > > + tr -d '\012\015' > > +} > > It's possible to insert a literal CR in the 'sed' expression, which > does match correctly on BSD (and MacOS). For instance: > > CR=$(printf "\r") > sed -e "s/$CR/\
/g" Okay. But since we are talking about displaying some chunk of text, I would rather just delete the CR here anyway. Ciao, Dscho