Re: [BUG] index corruption with git commit -p

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 01 2018, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've just had a scary error:
> 	error: index uses $?+? extension, which we do not understand
> 	fatal: index file corrupt
>
> Things were quickly recovered by deleting the index but it clearly
> looks to a but to me.
>
> Here are the steps to reproduce it:
>   $ git clone git://github.com/lucvoo/sparse-dev.git <somedir>
>   $ cd <somedir>
>   $ git co index-corruption
>   $ git rm -r validation/ Documentation/
>   $ git commit -m <some message> -p
>   $ git status
> error: index uses $?+? extension, which we do not understand
> fatal: index file corrupt
>
>
> The 'extension' pattern '$?+?', can vary a bit, sometimes
> it's just '????', but always seems 4 chars.
> If the commit command doesn't use the '-p' flag, there is no
> problem. The repository itself is not corrupted, it's only
> the index. It happends with git 2.18.0 and 2.17.0

Yeah this is a bug, I didn't dig much but testing with this script down
to 2.8.0:

    #!/bin/sh

    cd ~/g/git
    make -j $(parallel --number-of-cores) USE_LIBPCRE2=YesPlease CFLAGS="-O0 -g -ggdb3" DEVELOPER=1 DEVOPTS=no-error NO_OPENSSL=Y all

    (
        rm -rf /tmp/x;
        ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git clone git://github.com/lucvoo/sparse-dev.git /tmp/x &&
        cd /tmp/x &&
        ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git checkout index-corruption &&
        ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git rm -r validation/ Documentation/ &&
        ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git commit -p
    )

    ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git -C /tmp/x status

    if ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git -C /tmp/x status
    then
        exit 0
    else
        exit 1
    fi

I found that the first bad commit was: 680ee550d7 ("commit: skip
discarding the index if there is no pre-commit hook", 2017-08-14)

Now, note the two invocations of "status" in my script. Before we'd
already been complaining about a bad index, but after that commit is the
first time we started getting a persistent error, and indeed even
reverting it now on top of master makes the error non-persistent.

So not a fix, but a strong signal to see where we should start
looking. I.e. the index file handling around discard_cache() &
"interactive" in commit.c is likely what's broken.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux