Re: [PATCH 0/9] worktree: fix bugs and broaden --force applicability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 05:04:32AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:54 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] doc-diff: force worktree add
> >
> > We avoid re-creating our temporary worktree if it's already
> > there. But we may run into a situation where the worktree
> > has been deleted, but an entry still exists in
> > $GIT_DIR/worktrees.
> 
> Can "clean" or "distclean" also be augmented to remove this worktree
> (and directory)? I guess that "distclean" would make more sense than
> "clean"(?).

I suppose so. I don't think I've _ever_ used distclean, and I only
rarely use "clean" (a testament to our Makefile's efforts to accurately
track dependencies). I'd usually use "git clean" when I want something
pristine (because I don't want to trust the Makefile at all).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux