On Thu, Aug 30 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Junio, > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> >> > The `stash` command only incidentally requires that the author is set, as >> > it calls `git commit` internally (which records the author). As stashes >> > are intended to be local only, that author information was never meant to >> > be a vital part of the `stash`. >> > >> > I could imagine that an even better enhancement request would ask for `git >> > stash` to work even if `user.name` is not configured. >> >> This would make a good bite-sized microproject, worth marking it as >> #leftoverbits unless somebody is already working on it ;-) > > Right. > > What is our currently-favored approach to this, again? Do we have a > favorite wiki page to list those, or do we have a bug tracker for such > mini-projects? > > Once I know, I will add this, with enough information to get anybody > interested started. I believe the "official" way, such as it is, is you just put #leftoverbits in your E-Mail, then search the list archives, e.g. https://public-inbox.org/git/?q=%23leftoverbits So e.g. I've taken to putting this in my own E-Mails where I spot something I'd like to note as a TODO that I (or someone else) could work on later: https://public-inbox.org/git/?q=%23leftoverbits+f%3Aavarab%40gmail.com
