On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:21:27PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 08:56:21PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > > I would quite like to see this series picked up for v2.20. If we want > > to minimize performance regressions with the SHA-256 work, I think it's > > important. > > Thanks. One of the things I was worried about was causing unnecessary > conflicts with existing topics, including your work. But if everybody is > on board, I'd be happy to see this go in early in the next release cycle > (the longer we wait, the more annoying conflicts Junio has to resolve). I can send out work that doesn't conflict with this while it makes its way to master. There are a lot of test fixes that can go in in the mean time. I will be sending out a series that actually implements SHA-256 as an RFC soon, but I don't think there will be any conflicts (and it will just be an RFC anyway). -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
