On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 08:50:28PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote: > buffer is unlikely to contain a NUL character, so printing its contents > using %s in a die() format is unsafe (detected with ASan). Having mostly forgotten about our earlier discussion, I got confused by this, thinking the problem was that there is some issue with missing NULs in the input. But it is really just: We read() into a buffer and on error format the contents using "%s". But read() does not NUL-terminate, so die() might walk past the end of the buffer. We _might_ be saved by a NUL in the input, but that is not the primary concern. ;) Not worth a re-roll on its own, but since there is some other discussion, I thought I'd mention my confusion. :) > Added error check. > Hopefully fixed my MUA config.. > > fsck.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Patch itself looks good to me. -Peff
