Re: [PATCH] range-diff: update stale summary of --no-dual-color

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jonathan,

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>  		OPT_INTEGER(0, "creation-factor", &creation_factor,
>  			    N_("Percentage by which creation is weighted")),
> -		OPT_BOOL(0, "no-dual-color", &simple_color,
> -			    N_("color both diff and diff-between-diffs")),
> +		OPT_BOOL(0, "dual-color", &dual_color,
> +			    N_("color both diff and diff-between-diffs (default)")),

There is one very good reason *not* to do that. And that reason is the
output of `git range-diff -h`. If anybody read that the option
`--dual-color` exists, they are prone to believe that the default is *not*
dual color. In contrast, when reading `--no-dual-color`, it is clear that
dual color mode is the default.

Ciao,
Dscho

>  		OPT_END()
>  	};
>  	int i, j, res = 0;
> @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ int cmd_range_diff(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  			     options + ARRAY_SIZE(options) - 1, /* OPT_END */
>  			     builtin_range_diff_usage, 0);
>  
> -	if (simple_color < 1) {
> -		if (!simple_color)
> +	if (dual_color != 0) {
> +		if (dual_color > 0)
>  			/* force color when --dual-color was used */
>  			diffopt.use_color = 1;
>  		diffopt.flags.dual_color_diffed_diffs = 1;
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux