Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:23 PM Matthew DeVore <matvore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Teach list-objects the "tree:0" filter which allows for filtering
> out all tree and blob objects (unless other objects are explicitly
> specified by the user). The purpose of this patch is to allow smaller
> partial clones.
>
> The name of this filter - tree:0 - does not explicitly specify that
> it also filters out all blobs, but this should not cause much confusion
> because blobs are not at all useful without the trees that refer to
> them.
>
> I also consider only:commits as a name, but this is inaccurate because
> it suggests that annotated tags are omitted, but actually they are
> included.

Speaking of tag objects, it is possible to tag anything, including blobs.
Would a blob that is tagged (hence reachable without a tree) be not
filtered by tree:0 (or in the future any deeper depth) ?

I found this series a good read, despite my unfamiliarity of the
partial cloning.

One situation where I scratched my head for a second were previous patches
that  use "test_line_count = 0 rev_list_err" whereas using test_must_be_empty
would be an equally good choice (I am more used to the latter than the former)

Thanks,
Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux