Re: Debugging strange "corrupt pack" errors on SuSE 9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/20/07, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But because you push to a local repository (a mounted USB stick is
> considered a local repo) then you don't get to negociate the pack
> capabilities of the final destination, and therefore more "bad" delta
> objects might sneak in again.

How does that work? So any repo we push _from_ can override (and muck
up) the destination repo, ignoring its config?

That sounds a bit broken - the pack being built for a local
destination should respect the settings of the destination repo.

OTOH, as a workaround, it _should_ work if I force a repack on the
usb-repo after each push, right? It'll wear the USB disk out, waste
human+cpu time and kill some kittens along the way, but it'll do for
the time being.

cheers,


m
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux