On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:09:37PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote: > When cloning with --mirror, the clone gets its HEAD initialized with > the value HEAD has in its origin remote. After that if HEAD changes in > origin there is no simple way to sync HEAD at the same time as the > refs are synced. > > It looks like the simplest way to sync HEAD is: > > 1) git remote show origin > 2) parse "HEAD branch: XXX" from the output of the above command > 3) git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/XXX How about: git remote set-head origin -a ? > It looks like it would be quite easy to add an option to `fetch` to > sync HEAD at the same time as regular refs are synced because every > fetch from an origin that uses a recent Git contains something like: I think the "remote set-head" option is not very discoverable, since people are used to working with "fetch", making it the natural place to look. Just like we ported "remote update" over to "fetch --all", I think it would be sensible to have "fetch --update-head" or similar. One tricky thing is that the name "refs/remotes/<remote>/HEAD" is only special by convention, and that convention is known on the writing side only by git-clone and git-remote. So obviously: git fetch --update-head https://example.com/ is nonsense. We don't even have a ref. What should: git config remote.origin.fetch refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/foo/* git fetch --update-head origin do? Should it update based no the remote name, or based on the refspec? What happens if there are several refspecs? Etc. 99% of the time those questions won't come up. But we should design so that we do the obvious thing in those 99%, and something sane in the other 1%. -Peff