On Mon, Aug 13 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This is unchanged from what's been cooking in pu for months now, so >> hopefully it can be merged down faster than most, and then I can later >> submit the actual meat of this series once I fix the (mostly doc) >> issues with it. > > They have been held in 'pu' only because you said they were not > ready, I think ;-) You had some feedback to 6, 8 & 10 in the last round which I haven't addressed yet. I think the "not ready" comment you're remembering is this for v1: https://public-inbox.org/git/CACBZZX4yG5h5kk4NFQz_NzAweMa+Nh3H-39OHtcH4XWsA6FGpg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > I can confirm that the first 5 do look the same, and you dropped the > old 6, 8 and 10. The remainder look the same. Yup! > I quickly re-scanned them and all of them looked obviously good. > Will discard the remainder and requeue. Thanks!
