On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > In my branch at: git://iabervon.org/~barkalow/git builtin-fetch > > > > I have a bunch of not-for-merging history leading up to a C version of > > fetch which passes all of the tests except that: > > > > * it might be fetching too much with --depth. > > That should be fixable. (If I get more time this week than I expect, I'll > do it myself.) I just haven't taken the time to look at what it's supposed to do exactly, since I wasn't paying attention to the discussions there. > > * bundle isn't implemented. > > That's an easy one. Yeah, just a section in transport.c about it, but the functions I need aren't available directly and I got distracted until I was looking at my list of what tests I'd disabled. > > * when a branch config file section refers to a branches/* remote, the > > merge setting is used (if one is given), even though this isn't useful > > either way. > > Maybe this is the right time to cut off branches/* and remotes/*? It's not actually too difficult to support them, except for some weird combination cases that nobody would do anyway. I just made the remote.c config file parser generate the corresponding configurations from them, and the rest of the code doesn't have to care. The only oddity is that I had to support having a remote always auto-follow tags, even without tracking branches, because that's what branches/* did. But this is probably a reasonable thing to support as an option anyway. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html