On 8/13/2018 12:31 PM, Jeff King wrote:
For the past several years, we've held a Git Contributor Summit as part of the Git Merge conference. I'd like to get opinions from the community to help plan future installments. Any feedback or opinion is welcome, but some obvious things to think about: - where, when, and how often? Plans are shaping up to have Git Merge 2019 in Brussels right after FOSDEM in February (like it was two years ago), with a contributor summit attached. Are there people who would be more likely to attend a contributor summit if it were held elsewhere (e.g., in North America, probably in the Bay Area)? Are people interested in attending a separate contributor summit not attached to the larger Git Merge (and if so, is there any other event it might be worth connecting it with, time-wise)? Are people interested in going to two summits in a year (e.g., Brussels in February, and then maybe some in North America later in the year), or is that diminishing returns?
I've only been to one contributor summit, but found it extremely useful in meeting community members face-to-face. I think the time spent was very productive.
I would be up for two meetings a year. I would expect that the variety of locations would allow a larger set of contributors to make at least one meeting a year. This may come at a cost of a smaller group in each summit.
- format For those who haven't attended before, it's basically 25-ish Git (and associated project) developers sitting in a room for a day chatting about the project. Topics go on a whiteboard in the morning, and then we discuss each for 30-60 minutes. We could do multiple days (which might give more room for actually working collaboratively instead of just discussing). We could do something more formal (like actual talks). We could do something less formal (like an all-day spaghetti buffet, where conversation happens only between mouthfuls). The sky is the limit. Some of those ideas may be better than others.
The one thing I found missing that could be good is to have a remote option. Not everyone can travel or can afford to do so. I wonder if a simple Google Hangout could allow more participation from the community, even in a passive sense (those still at their day jobs listening in). It could even facilitate remote presenters, if applicable.
I hope this can stimulate a discussion on the list, but of course if anybody has private feedback about past events or future planning, feel free to email me off-list.
Thanks for starting the discussion early! -Stolee